The briefing was prompted by an article in The Seattle Times on January 2 that contrasted SPD’s stated goal of responding within seven minutes to the highest priority 911 calls against the reality the Times analysis of response times revealed. (911 calls labeled Priority 1 involve incidents creating risk to life or serious injury, crimes in progress, officer or firefighter safety, and other emergency events.)
I remember attending many similar briefings over the past eight years and hearing police leadership repeat over and over again that they met the seven minute standard consistently and city-wide. Yesterday, we heard a very different report.
Unfortunately, the former leadership in SPD used a calculation methodology that arbitrarily and artificially lowered response time figures.* While this method allowed them to claim they were meeting their goal, it did not match what Seattle residents expected or experienced. Chief Kathy O’Toole and her leadership team acknowledged yesterday that the Times article prompted them to look more closely at the calculations and provide a more accurate assessment. Bravo to Chief O’Toole and her team.
Before sharing the new numbers, it’s important to keep several factors in mind.
First, average response times do not necessarily reflect the quality of police work, nor does getting to the scene of an incident faster necessarily lead to more arrests or a reduction in crime. At best, response times are one factor to be considered—among many—when making decisions about officer deployment.
Second, how response times are calculated is very important. Seattle measures response times from the moment 911 call information is sent to a dispatcher to the moment an officer reports arriving at the scene of the incident. Not included in this calculation is the time it takes the 911 operator to receive the call, determine the nature of the incident, and enter the details into the 911 dispatch database, a period of time that could last seconds to a minute or more.
Average Response Times to Priority 1 911 Calls
Between 2010 and 2012, the citywide average response time to Priority 1 911 calls increased from approximately eight minutes to over nine and a half minutes. But, as the following table shows there are significant differences by police precinct. (You can view the police precinct maps here.)
911 Call Volumes
Police service demand as measured by 911 calls has increased 13% over the past five years. But, as the next table shows, Priority 1 911 calls have increased 52% in the same period of time, indicating a shift in how our officers’ work load is changing. Non-Priority 1 911 calls have risen only 7% in the past five years.
The sharp increase in Priority 1 calls shows that the nature of work for patrol officers is shifting, with more time being spent on more serious incidents. All other things being equal, this inevitably means that lower priority calls get slower response times.
|All 911 Calls|
|Priority 1 Calls|
|All Other Calls|
You can find SPD’s presentation from yesterday’s briefing here.
*Before yesterday, SPD included in their analysis of response times what are called “on-view” incidents where officers come across an event on their own without being dispatched. By their nature, on-view incidents have a response time of zero since it is discovered without there being a 911 call. Including on-view incidents artificially reduced the overall average response time. SPD would also eliminate from the analysis calls with response times of more than 15 minutes claiming that these would be anomalies for Priority 1 calls, again artificially reducing the overall average response time.